views
Mumbai: The outgoing Chairman of the Tata Group Ratan Tata is "rattled" by India's current image emerging from scams and retrospective taxation, and wants the government to give an "irreversible commitment" that law of the land has sanctity. "Never before has India had that kind of image," he said three weeks ahead of his retirement on December 28 after serving the group for 50 years including 21 years as Chairman.
Tata, who turns 75 later this month, spoke about the major decisions taken during his chairmanship, the current investment scenario, and business ethics and crony capitalism. India has been "hurt" by scams, court process and some of the retrospective taxation acts which had given "a sense of uncertainty to investors in terms of the credibility of the government", he said.
"You get FIPB approval to invest in India and to own a company, you get a licence to operate and, then three years later the same government.. tells you that your licences are illegal and that you have lost everything. This leads to a great deal of uncertainty. Never before has India had that kind of image. So that really rattled me because then anything can happen," the Tata patriarch said.
India must give an "irreversible commitment" that law of the land has sanctity and the government approval cannot be taken lightly, he emphasised, adding "otherwise India would be taken lightly". Despite being critical of the current situation, Tata sounded quite optimistic about the future of India as an economic power.
Welcoming the recent steps taken by the government to boost investor confidence, Tata said, "what they did recently to FDI and other things, I think, will reinstate some degree of confidence". While these steps may have had a "great" positive impact it was not not enough, he said.
"There will have to be efforts made to reassure people that the laws that are in place, the legislation that is in place, is here to stay. If it is changed, it has to be changed in some rational way of announcing a change which is prospective and not retrospective," he said. Describing FDI in multi-brand retail as a significant step, Tata said that it would help the consumer in terms of having an opportunity to choose, hopefully at lower cost. "If it doesn't do that then the model has failed."
Tata had words of praise for Prime Minister Manmohan Singh describing him as a leader of high integrity and an architect of the 1990 reforms. "My view is that the PM had to move. If he got attacked from all sides... you don't do anything after that. If you want him to do something and you attack him from all sides, then in all likelihood he would not not do anything."
Answering a question about crony capitalism, the Tata Chairman said it was becoming an issue not only in India but globally. India was not a leader in this but "we are quite prominent". He said crony capitalism leads to a situation of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. This disparity leads to an unhealthy situation in which power is focused in certain pockets and a "skewed" competitive situation, he said.
Tata said the problem of crony capitalism can be done away with basically by the law being implemented in its spirit. "There is nothing wrong with the legislations that we are doing with. What we unfortunately tend to do in India is we legislate, drafting of which is fairly ok, but enforcement of it is poor," he said.
Then, Tata said, it leads to non-compliance or violation which brings a new legislation which blocks everybody as if all are violators. "But the violators continue to operate because enforcement is still inadequate. So now you got a very biased
legislation that has replaced a good one that makes it impossible for you to operate legally or very difficult for you to operate and accentuates the situation more. If we had stronger legislation, with no exceptions based on who you are or whom you know, then I think crony capitalism would finally find its own limit," he said.
Asked if the problem was getting worse, Tata said, "Yes. It's just an observation, I have no facts or figures to prove it." To a question on his statement that the fabric of Indian values and the ethics was slowly deteriorating, specially in the business community, he said, "I hold to that view."
Elaborating, he said he thought the system was partly responsible for that because if a company follows a value system then operations were definitely much more difficult than they were "if you would comply with the standards that are in existence today".
Comments
0 comment