I can't go back to candy floss: Johar
I can't go back to candy floss: Johar
In spite of all the criticism he received for KANK, Karan Johar is not ready to return to candy floss.

Mumbai: Having got the flak for endorsing infidelity in his latest film, Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna, director Karan Johar is now trying his level best to undo the damage and says his film tries to convey that nobody should go in for a loveless marriage.

"I haven't been irresponsible towards my audience. The message, if any, is marry for the right reason. And if you're in a miserable marriage you're wronging two people," Johar said.

He says audiences are free to interpret his film, which boasts of big names like Amitabh Bachchan, Shah Rukh Khan, Rani Mukerjee and Preity Zinta, the way they want to.

"You can look at my take on marriage positively or negatively. The characters have their own point of view. Rani's father-in-law wants her to leave. Shah Rukh's mother wants to stay with his wife even though the wife throws Shah Rukh out. There's poise, dignity and class in all the characters," Johar explained.

And in spite of all the criticism, Johar is not ready to return to candy floss.

"I've changed. At 25, I made Kuch Kuch Hota Hai because I felt mushy. At 29, I did Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham because I felt reverent towards my parents. At 31, when I wrote Kal Ho Naa Ho, it was a manifestation of my fear of death. I felt I was going to lose someone dear, and I did (father Yash Johar). At 34, I'm a quiet silent observer. That's why I've made KANK," Johar said.

Excerpts from an interview:

Subhash K Jha: Are you endorsing infidelity in Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (KANK)?

Karan Johar: I don't claim to be an expert on marriage or anything else. I'm not endorsing anything. KANK is my take on what happens when people marry for the wrong reason. The true foundation of an enduring marriage is tremendous love. If that love isn't there, things can go wrong any time in a marriage.

That's what happens in KANK. My characters behave in a particular way because they are my characters. You don't have to agree with what the characters do or say.

Subhash K Jha: People are reacting vehemently to the Shah Rukh-Rani extramarital affair.

Karan Johar: Every married person sees a bit of him or herself in the characters. They're reacting to the characters. KANK is like watching an experience rather than watching a film.

Everyone wants to know why Rani doesn't love Abhishek's character. But she doesn't! That's it. There're millions of women who go on being miserable in passionless marriages. I'm not telling those women to go out and have an affair. But you don't need to be in a loveless marriage. That's what KANK says.

Subhash K Jha: Surely there are obligations in a marriage that go beyond self-gratification?

Karan Johar: I agree. But children shouldn't be made an excuse to keep a dead marriage going. Preity says, "I'm not one of those who accept defeat in life by making children their weakness. I'm not that weak." You cannot question why. That's the way these characters are.

PAGE_BREAK

Subhash K Jha: But a Johar film influences a large section of people.

Karan Johar: And I haven't been irresponsible towards my audience. The message, if any, is marry for the right reason. And if you're in a miserable marriage you're wronging two people. Amitji says in the film, "By carrying on an incomplete marriage you're denying love to yourself and your spouse."

Incomplete relationships are of no value to anyone. I'd love our women to become much more independent-minded and career-minded so that they could have a life of their own after a broken marriage.

Subhash K Jha: But you aren't married, so how do you know the do’s and don'ts of marriages?

Karan Johar: I'm not married. But I'm an observer of human relationships. And it's my right to use those observations as and how I wish. I know there will be various debates and discussions on KANK. And I welcome them. I'm overjoyed at the level of participation that the film has provoked. I'm so happy I have done a job that can touch people.

You can look at my take on marriage positively or negatively. The characters have their own point of view. Rani's father-in-law wants her to leave. Shah Rukh's mother wants to stay with his wife even though the wife throws Shah Rukh out. There's poise dignity and class in all the characters.

Subhash K Jha: Rani's character has no motivation for leaving her husband.

Karan Johar: Hers is the toughest role. She rebuffs a loving husband. But her character Maya feels maternal towards Rishi. She marries for the wrong reason. KANK is a film about very unhappy characters.

Subhash K Jha: I see a lot of Yash Chopra's Silsila in KANK.

Karan Johar: Where? Not consciously. I love Silsila. It's a super take on the cult of infidelity. But I think KANK tells its own story. My admiration for Silsila may have subconsciously crept into the film.

Subhash K Jha: What was the need for Kajol, Arjun Rampal, John Abraham and Riteish Deshmukh, who was finally cut out?

Karan Johar: Kajol is my lucky mascot. Arjun is an important character. He was someone Preity's character could have settled down with after her failed marriage. But she chose not to. John was a fun thing. Why not have a good looking deejay? You can't get anyone cooler for the job.

As for Riteish, there was a whole chunk with Rani in play school, which had to be cut off. Stars are important to a film. But you must understand I took a big risk by casting these stars against their images.

Subhash K Jha: Why cast Shah Rukh as a cynical and bitter man?

Karan Johar: He's unhappy because of his failures. When I projected him as the ebullient Rahul and Aman in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai and Kal Ho Naa Ho everyone said he needs a change of image. I'm going to get very upset if now people complain about his change of image.

What do you want me to do? I think Shah Rukh gives one of his best performances in KANK. He plays a grey, complex character and he has pulled it off with absolute conviction.

Subhash K Jha: What's the deal with Amitabh Bachchan?

Karan Johar: Abhishek's father in the film is a flamboyant character. And who better equipped than Amitji to play the role? He'll be called 'Sexy Sam' for a long time. He trusted that I'd handle his raunchy role with a certain class and dignity. Of course, Amitji is full of class and dignity.

Subhash K Jha: Were you prepared to open up a Pandora's Box?

Karan Johar: I did anticipate it. People say I've shown a mirror. And no one likes a mirror image. I know many Devs, Mayas, Rishis and Rheas and Sexy Sams. Each is a work of fiction but they're based on real life.

Thirty percent of the audience is shocked. But seventy percent identifies with the characters. This time I've given no candy floss. It's more like a slap on the face.

Subhash K Jha: Can you ever go back to candy floss?

Karan Johar: I can't, I've matured. I've changed. At 25, I made Kuch Kuch Hota Hai because I felt mushy. At 29, I did Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham because I felt reverent towards my parents.

At 31, when I wrote Kal Ho Naa Ho, it was a manifestation of my fear of death. I felt I was going to lose someone dear, and I did (father Yash Johar). At 34, I'm a quiet silent observer. That's why I've made KANK.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://lamidix.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!